Penis Size Theories- Part I

Penis Size and Pleasurability

Oh long has the debate been between what a man carries in his pants and his ability to pleasure a woman with what nature gave him. We try to massage the feelings of the masses by reassuring them that it's the motion in the ocean. This topic has long been a favorite of the tryst girls. Because, we'll be honest, it does matter... at least to us. And we bet to a lot of other women too.

I've been working on my theory that a man's penis size directly correlates with his foreplay skills. The reasoning behind it is simple. If a man is well endowed (in girth particularly), he has an easier time pleasing a woman without too much effort or awkward positioning. Similar to a person who is deaf and has a keener eye, a man with less than adequate equipment learns to make up in other areas. So in fact, it's not a result of genetics that a small man is more adapt with his hands, but a means of survival. In part II, we'll discuss the evolution of the penis and why we believe there's still small ones around. But as you can imagine, the ability to perform excellent cunnilingus is an upper hand in a man's fitness.

I can tell a story of one case in particular. His girth wasn't up to snuff. He was an otherwise good lover, and always willing to go over the top to please in any manner possible. But like most men of small size, he was aware of it and very sensitive on the subject. I tried to reassure him that he was "just fine" down there and it was just difficult for me to get off during sex regardless of size. He didn't believe me that size didn't matter. Unsatisfied with my assurances, one day he excuses himself mid-romp and comes back to continue having sex. I noticed something wasn't right. There seemed to be more involved down there than the usual! Freaked out, I jumped up to see what was going on. The doubting man had purchased a penile insert to put into a condom to try and satisfy me! Although thoughtful, it was akward, and I insisted he didn't need it. He insisted I try. Well, it took approximately two seconds for me to orgasm with the new device. But, embarassed that this was the first unmanipulated orgasm (by penis only) that I had with the man - and aware of the damage this could do to him, I hid the pleasure and pushed him off once it was over. I denied liking it, let alone cuming. Suddenly, I realized the mistake in ever lying to a man about his penis size. To get back to my theory, he may not have been well endowed, but he had far made up for it in other ways without needing any extra equipment. I think that's OK. But I handled the situation badly. Perhaps we just need to be praise his real talents, rather than trying to shelter his ego with insincerity that can lead to such akward scenarios that does more damage then good?
Mwah!
~Vi

ABOVE ALL LADIES, we must not hurt our man's ego! This is the ultimate turn off and will pretty much be an all expenses paid vacation for you and your vibrator for who knows how long. As much as men love sex, I've learned that they judge their sexual prowess on how much they please their woman. So we must make them feel like they are great at what the do if we ever want them inside us again! hahaha

Anyway, I agree with what Violet has said. I once dated a man that had the thinnest penis I'd ever seen, and may ever see again. The reason I was disappointed when I first saw/felt it was that I had built it up in my head after having some of the most intense and sexually stimulating make out sessions of my entire life with this guy. Upon further consideration however, it all made sense. He had made up for his lack of size by being the most amazing kisser, and could get me sufficiently turned on via foreplay to be ready to come almost instantly after he entered me. NOT TO MENTION he is the only guy to date that has successfully gotten me off via oral sex, ever. Good job, fella. Of course, I never, NEVER told him these theories about why he was a great lay, regardless of his size. Instead I was always sure to compliment him while making out and singing his praises post-coitus.

This brings me to a debate that Vi and I have had on several occasions. The question sparked after I had an 'affair' while dating another man.

The question is.... would you rather have:
a) a man with a large penis and low stamina, or
b) a man with a smaller penis and almost infinite stamina

After experiencing both, and even after what I said above, I'd pick the large penis with low stamina for the long term. The key is that this penis, since he can come so quickly, must be able to go again and get you off. If he were dead after orgasm and you were left unsatisfied, that would be unacceptable. This guy I speak of would generally come so quickly that he made me feel like the most attractive girl in the entire world. After taking a short breather to relax and enjoy, he would rev that engine right back up (and would still be pretty damn close to full mast) and would get me off however I desired. Not only did I feel comfort in him finding me attractive in his speed of orgasm, but sometimes I would make a game out of it to see how turned on I could get and see if I could come before him! I mean, why not? In regard to the smaller guy, while allowing me to come first, he would frequently take FOREVERRR to come. By that point it would no longer be enjoyable for me.

Ladies, what do you think? Take our poll and give us your opinion! You can click on more than one option! :)
-Lia